Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules 2017 Deleted

Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules 2017 Deleted

Original Rule Text

Deleted

Visual Summary

Rule Status

Officially Deleted

Current Applicability

Not in Force

Implication

Streamlined GFR

Executive Summary

Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017, which was part of Chapter 6 on Procurement of Goods and Services, has been officially deleted. This means that any provisions it previously contained are no longer active or applicable within the current framework of the rules. Government entities should not refer to or apply any guidelines that might have been associated with this rule.

In-Depth Analysis of the Rule

Introduction: Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017, is explicitly marked as ‘Deleted’ in the official document. This status indicates a deliberate removal of the rule from the regulatory framework, implying that its content is no longer relevant, has been superseded, or has been integrated into other existing provisions.

Breakdown of the Rule (or its absence):

  • Deletion Status: The most significant aspect of Rule 148 is its non-existence. It does not prescribe any procedures, powers, or guidelines.
  • Implication for Compliance: Since the rule is deleted, there are no compliance requirements or obligations associated with it. Government departments and entities are not expected to adhere to any former directives of this rule.
  • Context within GFR: Historically, rules in this section (Chapter 6) pertained to the procurement of goods and services. The deletion of Rule 148 suggests a potential streamlining or modification of procurement policies, requiring users to consult other active rules in the chapter.

Practical Example: As Rule 148 is deleted, there is no practical scenario for its application. Any government official or department seeking guidance on procurement should entirely disregard Rule 148 and instead refer to the active and relevant rules within Chapter 6, such as Rule 144 (Fundamental principles of public buying) or Rule 149 (Government e-Marketplace (GeM)), to ensure compliance with current regulations.

Related Provisions

While Rule 148 itself is deleted, understanding its former context within the procurement chapter can be aided by reviewing adjacent and foundational rules:

Learning Aids

Mnemonics
  • Rule 148: No more, no less, just gone from the GFR stress. (Helps remember its deletion and the resulting simplification).
Process Flowchart
Rule 148 DeletedNo Active Process

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)

1. What is the current status of Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017?

  • A) Active and in force
  • B) Under review for amendment
  • C) Deleted
  • D) Applicable only to specific ministries
Show Answer

Correct Answer: C) Deleted

2. If a rule is marked as “Deleted” in The General Financial Rules, 2017, what does it signify regarding its provisions?

  • A) They are temporarily suspended
  • B) They are no longer applicable
  • C) They are to be interpreted flexibly
  • D) They are binding only on new government projects
Show Answer

Correct Answer: B) They are no longer applicable

3. In which chapter of The General Financial Rules, 2017, was Rule 148 originally located?

  • A) Chapter 1: Introduction
  • B) Chapter 3: Budget Formulation and Implementation
  • C) Chapter 6: Procurement of Goods and Services
  • D) Chapter 9: Grants-in-Aid and Loans
Show Answer

Correct Answer: C) Chapter 6: Procurement of Goods and Services

4. Does the deletion of Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017, require government entities to follow its previous guidelines?

  • A) Yes, until a new rule is introduced
  • B) No, as the rule is no longer in force
  • C) Only if the previous guidelines are beneficial
  • D) Only with special approval from the Ministry of Finance
Show Answer

Correct Answer: B) No, as the rule is no longer in force

5. What is a likely reason for a rule being marked “Deleted” in The General Financial Rules, 2017?

  • A) To increase regulatory complexity
  • B) To introduce new, more stringent requirements
  • C) Simplification or redundancy of its provisions
  • D) To restrict access to information
Show Answer

Correct Answer: C) Simplification or redundancy of its provisions

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “Rule 148 Deleted” mean for government procurement?

It means that Rule 148, which was part of the procurement chapter in The General Financial Rules, 2017, has been removed and its provisions are no longer legally binding or applicable. Government entities should refer to other active rules for procurement guidance.

Are there any residual obligations under the deleted Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017?

No, there are no residual obligations. When a rule is deleted, its provisions cease to be in force, and government entities are not required to comply with any past directives of that specific rule.

Where can I find the content that was previously in Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017?

The current version of The General Financial Rules, 2017, explicitly states that Rule 148 is ‘Deleted’. To understand its previous content, one would need to consult an older version of the rules, if available. However, for current compliance, only the active rules should be considered.

Key Takeaways

  • Rule 148 of The General Financial Rules, 2017, is officially marked as ‘Deleted’.
  • Its provisions are no longer legally binding or applicable for government entities.
  • The deletion likely contributes to the simplification or streamlining of procurement processes.
  • For current procurement guidance, refer to other active rules within Chapter 6 of the GFR, 2017.

Conclusion

The explicit deletion of Rule 148 from The General Financial Rules, 2017, underscores the dynamic nature of financial regulations. It serves as a reminder for all government departments and officials to consistently refer to the most updated versions of legal documents to ensure full compliance and to avoid relying on outdated provisions. The removal of this rule contributes to a clearer and potentially more efficient regulatory landscape for procurement.