Section 5 of The Comptroller and Auditor-General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971
Leave Entitlements and Authority
Original Text
(2) Any other person who is appointed as the Comptroller and Auditor-General may be granted leave in accordance with such rules as are for the time being applicable to a member of the Indian Administrative Service.
(3) The power to grant or refuse leave to the Comptroller and Auditor-General and to revoke or curtail leave granted to him, shall vest in the President.
Visual Summary
Summary
Section 5 defines the leave entitlements for the Comptroller and Auditor-General (CAG). It creates a distinction based on the appointee’s background: those appointed from government service retain their previous service rules and accumulated leave, while those appointed from other backgrounds follow the rules applicable to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). Crucially, the section designates the President of India as the sole authority to approve or deny leave, ensuring the CAG’s administrative independence from government ministries.
Key Takeaways
- Continuity of Service: CAGs appointed from government service do not lose their accumulated leave; they can carry it forward.
- IAS Benchmark: For any CAG not from a government background, the leave rules are standardized to match the Indian Administrative Service.
- Executive Discretion: The President holds the ultimate power to grant, refuse, or revoke leave, preventing interference from the Executive (Ministers).
Key Analysis
- ➤ Protection of Rights: Sub-section (1) acts as a safeguard for career civil servants. By allowing the carry-forward of leave, the Act ensures that accepting the constitutional post of CAG does not penalize an officer by wiping out their earned benefits.
- ➤ Standardization: Sub-section (2) provides clarity for “outsiders” (e.g., economists or experts). Instead of creating a new set of rules, the Act references the established IAS rules, ensuring the CAG is treated on par with the highest level of civil service.
- ➤ Constitutional Independence: Sub-section (3) is critical for independence. If a Minister or Department Head controlled the CAG’s leave, they could potentially pressure the CAG by denying leave. Vesting this power in the President removes this leverage.
Key Ingredients
- Appointment as Comptroller and Auditor-General.
- Determination of immediate prior status (Government Service vs. Other).
- Application of relevant rules (Previous Service Rules or IAS Rules).
- Presidential approval for grant or refusal of leave.
Related Provisions
Practical Illustrations
Process Flowchart
Practice Questions
Q: Who has the authority to grant or refuse leave to the Comptroller and Auditor-General?
- A. The Prime Minister
- B. The Parliament
- C. The President
- D. The Chief Justice of India
View Correct Answer
Reasoning: Section 5(3) explicitly states that the power to grant or refuse leave vests in the President.
Q: Which rules apply to a CAG appointed from a non-government background regarding leave?
- A. Supreme Court Judges Rules
- B. Indian Administrative Service (IAS) Rules
- C. Member of Parliament Rules
- D. Central Civil Services Rules
View Correct Answer
Reasoning: Section 5(2) specifies that “any other person” (non-govt) is granted leave in accordance with rules applicable to a member of the IAS.
Q: Can a CAG appointed from government service carry forward their accumulated leave?
- A. No, all previous leave lapses
- B. Yes, but only up to 30 days
- C. Yes, they are entitled to carry forward the amount standing at their credit
- D. Only if the President grants special permission
View Correct Answer
Reasoning: Section 5(1) explicitly allows the carry forward of leave standing at their credit on the date of assuming office.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the CAG lose their accumulated leave when they are appointed?
Can the Government (Executive) deny leave to the CAG?
What rules apply if a private sector expert is appointed as CAG?
Conclusion
Section 5 is a vital administrative provision that safeguards the rights of the Comptroller and Auditor-General while ensuring their independence. By preserving the accrued benefits of former civil servants and standardizing rules for others against the IAS benchmark, it ensures fair treatment, while vesting approval authority in the President insulates the office from political pressure.